<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vosges in December</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/172/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/172</link>
	<description>Black &#38; White Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 02:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/172/comment-page-1#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=172#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Thanks for replying and you just cheered me up on a Monday morning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for replying and you just cheered me up on a Monday morning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/172/comment-page-1#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=172#comment-706</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s digital. I think the trick here was to use spot metering on the brightest part and just take that exposure plus two stops. Then, in Photoshop or whatever program, keep the contrast down and the snow values high. The trees and other features naturally fall on dark values.

What you describe on your Seddale post on your blog is really quite similar and that was certainly not a failure :-)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s digital. I think the trick here was to use spot metering on the brightest part and just take that exposure plus two stops. Then, in Photoshop or whatever program, keep the contrast down and the snow values high. The trees and other features naturally fall on dark values.</p>
<p>What you describe on your Seddale post on your blog is really quite similar and that was certainly not a failure <img src='http://lumieredargent.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/172/comment-page-1#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=172#comment-705</guid>
		<description>I really like this image with it&#039;s subtle tones. I tried to do something similar over Xmas but failed badly! Film or digital capture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this image with it&#8217;s subtle tones. I tried to do something similar over Xmas but failed badly! Film or digital capture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

