<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoFoBoMo: I don&#8217;t Get It.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230</link>
	<description>Black &#38; White Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hoehne</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/comment-page-1#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hoehne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=230#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>consider it an exam, do the best you can in the alloted time.  You have been practicing your art for a long time, it is time to show what you can do.
or simply do not take up the challenge, that is OK as well.
For me it gave me the push to get something together, now I have 3 x 36 picture portfolios that I did not have before the &#039;08 challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>consider it an exam, do the best you can in the alloted time.  You have been practicing your art for a long time, it is time to show what you can do.<br />
or simply do not take up the challenge, that is OK as well.<br />
For me it gave me the push to get something together, now I have 3 x 36 picture portfolios that I did not have before the &#8217;08 challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/comment-page-1#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 05:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=230#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>&quot;If the challenges are of value to their participants, if they can find it part of their wider ‘process’, isn’t that enough?&quot;

Maybe. I just say I don&#039;t understand it nor share the enthusiasm for the idea. Now, of course, if people have fun doing it, by all means, they should do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the challenges are of value to their participants, if they can find it part of their wider ‘process’, isn’t that enough?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe. I just say I don&#8217;t understand it nor share the enthusiasm for the idea. Now, of course, if people have fun doing it, by all means, they should do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Cowling</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/comment-page-1#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Cowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=230#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>I think I could agree with you if anyone was suggesting that SoFo/Nano should exist in isolation or should be the extent of anyone&#039;s ambition. I am not aware that they are.

Quality is not a criteria in these challenges, for who would judge it? The nano organisers make much of reminding people that the only person you can cheat in the challenge is yourself. So participants must judge for themselves if it is worth it to *them* to prioritise a completed project, for this one month, over the possible restraints on &#039;the best they can do&#039;.

If the challenges are of value to their participants, if they can find it part of their wider &#039;process&#039;, isn&#039;t that enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I could agree with you if anyone was suggesting that SoFo/Nano should exist in isolation or should be the extent of anyone&#8217;s ambition. I am not aware that they are.</p>
<p>Quality is not a criteria in these challenges, for who would judge it? The nano organisers make much of reminding people that the only person you can cheat in the challenge is yourself. So participants must judge for themselves if it is worth it to *them* to prioritise a completed project, for this one month, over the possible restraints on &#8216;the best they can do&#8217;.</p>
<p>If the challenges are of value to their participants, if they can find it part of their wider &#8216;process&#8217;, isn&#8217;t that enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/comment-page-1#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=230#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to share your opinion.

Where I differ is that I would not be able to feel I have achieved something if the content does not matter.

Art means work, the process. But I think SoFoBoMo pushes the concept too far. I think it is a drive to create empty, superficial, &quot;Mc Donald&#039;s&quot; art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to share your opinion.</p>
<p>Where I differ is that I would not be able to feel I have achieved something if the content does not matter.</p>
<p>Art means work, the process. But I think SoFoBoMo pushes the concept too far. I think it is a drive to create empty, superficial, &#8220;Mc Donald&#8217;s&#8221; art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Cowling</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/comment-page-1#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Cowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=230#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a photographer, I won&#039;t be doing Sofobomo, but I would like to defend it a little from the perspective of having done NaNoWriMo.
Like Sobo, the emphasis is on meeting the bones of the challenge, ie a 50k word novel in 30 days... it isn&#039;t about quality.

Some people can motivate and complete projects without such a challenge, some of us find it harder and an online challenge can offer us benefits:
- a fixed timescale, it might take over your life, but only for a month. That&#039;s manageable.
- support and community. When the going is tough it can be a great help to know there are others going through the same thing, to hear how they are coping, share tips and strategies.... I found that the act of being encouraging to others gave me great motivation to practice what I was preaching.
- the making of a public statement of intent. For lots of us this is a great motivator.
-Process. I had harboured a notion of writing for years but was fairly clueless. The defined timescale helped me focus research on process and then I just had to take the leap and *do* it.
-Learning. I learned more about how to write by *doing* it than I ever would thinking about it, making tentative starts and thinking it wasn&#039;t good enough and giving up...

Neither Nano nor Sobo *stop* people making/writing a book that takes longer, is more highly crafted, better. But they can give people the boost to get started. You may not produce the best work of your life, but you produce a step towards it. If you wait until you are ready to write a Booker winner you may never start. For many of us the best book is the one that we succeeed in getting *out* of our heads and into the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a photographer, I won&#8217;t be doing Sofobomo, but I would like to defend it a little from the perspective of having done NaNoWriMo.<br />
Like Sobo, the emphasis is on meeting the bones of the challenge, ie a 50k word novel in 30 days&#8230; it isn&#8217;t about quality.</p>
<p>Some people can motivate and complete projects without such a challenge, some of us find it harder and an online challenge can offer us benefits:<br />
- a fixed timescale, it might take over your life, but only for a month. That&#8217;s manageable.<br />
- support and community. When the going is tough it can be a great help to know there are others going through the same thing, to hear how they are coping, share tips and strategies&#8230;. I found that the act of being encouraging to others gave me great motivation to practice what I was preaching.<br />
- the making of a public statement of intent. For lots of us this is a great motivator.<br />
-Process. I had harboured a notion of writing for years but was fairly clueless. The defined timescale helped me focus research on process and then I just had to take the leap and *do* it.<br />
-Learning. I learned more about how to write by *doing* it than I ever would thinking about it, making tentative starts and thinking it wasn&#8217;t good enough and giving up&#8230;</p>
<p>Neither Nano nor Sobo *stop* people making/writing a book that takes longer, is more highly crafted, better. But they can give people the boost to get started. You may not produce the best work of your life, but you produce a step towards it. If you wait until you are ready to write a Booker winner you may never start. For many of us the best book is the one that we succeeed in getting *out* of our heads and into the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/230/comment-page-1#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=230#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>My thoughts exactly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
