<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lumière d'Argent &#187; resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/tag/resolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp</link>
	<description>Black &#38; White Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Epson V750 True Resolution</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/87</link>
		<comments>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/87#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v7x0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among comments I got in different forums after the previous article, some pointed out I could have got even better results had I used a higher resolution. Others said 3200dpi was way above the Epson true resolution. Well, I must admit I had chosen the 3200dpi resolution because I knew 6400dpi was ridiculous and 3200dpi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/87/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epson V750: Good enough for 35mm?</title>
		<link>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/76</link>
		<comments>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b&w]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v7x0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vuescan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumieredargent.com/wp/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Epson line of flatbeds has been much maligned over the years for having inadequate resolution for film scanning. It has been gradually accepted they got good enough for medium format but it is still common to read that for 35mm film, one really needs a dedicated film scanner. I am in the process of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lumieredargent.com/wp/archives/76/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
